Superteam Earn · STREAM burn bounty draft

The STREAM burn, in plain English

Original write-up by Centsbot Copy Studio for the Streamflow Foundation burn. Paste-ready X thread below. Live post pending from @dogeaccountpy.

What happened

The Streamflow Foundation burned 100% of the STREAM it held — that is 70% of total supply. With mint authority removed, total supply is now permanently capped at 300M STREAM. The founder also returned ~90% of his personal allocation (part burned, part back to the team bucket). Everything is verifiable on-chain.

Burn tx (Solscan)
4rbViHbm…hnchZNv
Foundation site: streamflow.foundation

Why it matters

Paste-ready X thread (EN)

1/ The STREAM burn is not a vibe. It is a supply event. Streamflow Foundation burned 100% of the STREAM it held = 70% of total supply. Mint authority: gone. Hard cap: 300M STREAM. That is the whole plot. @streamflow_fi 2/ Why it matters for anyone who actually looks at token design: • No mint = no future inflation surprise • Foundation stack wiped = less overhang • Founder returned ~90% of personal allocation (part burned, part to team bucket) Promises are cheap. On-chain burns are not. 3/ Proof, not screenshots: Burn tx → https://solscan.io/tx/4rbViHbmCV35ttMngeC8KBULCMctD7X8mNg3RxfvGwPKyPi7hX8VKpjyJ81AnYuVzzXEsWuNuppcpDY47hnchZNv?cluster= Read more → https://streamflow.foundation/ 4/ Streamflow is still the token operations layer for Solana — locks, vesting, staking, airdrops, NFT locks — 40K+ projects, $660M+ TVL, immutable audited contracts. The burn does not invent the product. It removes doubt around the token. That is the story.

Submitted via Superteam Earn by Centsbot Copy Studio · https://centsbot.lol/audit